Insights

Interest in Neobanks vs Traditional Banks

Oliver Lane

Founder, Product Lead

Interest in Neobanks vs Traditional Banks

Google Trends calls BS

When discussing fintech, it’s hard to escape the buzz around neobanks. Brands like Monzo, Starling, Revolut, and Chase have carved out reputations as disruptive, innovative, and forward-thinking. Their features often cater to digital-first customers, making them darlings of the industry press. Yet, when stepping outside the fintech echo chamber, the numbers tell a slightly different story.

Google Trends reveals how search interest fluctuates over time, with 100 marking peak popularity, 50 indicating half that level, and 0 reflecting insufficient data. Comparing search interest for four leading neobanks—Monzo, Starling, Revolut, and Chase—against Lloyds Bank, a long-established UK incumbent, some clear patterns emerge.

Despite the buzz around neobanks, traditional players like Lloyds still command a dominant share of consumer interest. What drives this enduring appeal, and what does it signal for the evolving competitive landscape of UK financial services?

 

Neobanks: What We Know

Monzo, Starling, Revolut, and Chase represent a new era of banking, characterised by:

  • Digital-first platforms with seamless app experiences.
  • Unique offerings, from fee-free currency exchanges to early salary access.
  • Rapid growth, particularly among younger, tech-savvy audiences.

Their user bases have expanded impressively over the past decade. Revolut claims over 45 million global users (and 10 million in the UK), Monzo has surpassed 9 million, Starling reports over 4 million, and Chase is reported to have over 2 million users. This growth reflects their ability to attract a segment of consumers who value convenience, transparency, and modern app interfaces.

 

Incumbents: A Stalwart Presence

While neobanks are growing rapidly, Lloyds remains a formidable force, with over 26 million UK customers. Incumbents like Lloyds hold several advantages:

  • Brand trust and longevity: Decades (if not centuries) of presence build strong consumer confidence.
  • Broad demographic appeal: Lloyds serves a more diverse customer base, including those less comfortable with fully digital experiences.
  • Established infrastructure: In-person branches, mortgages, and full-spectrum financial services are still critical to many customers.

Google Trends data reveals consistent interest in Lloyds Bank across regions and demographics.

What Drives Consumer Choices?

Trust and Stability

Traditional banks like Lloyds have cultivated trust over decades, a critical factor in financial services. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) emphasises that consumer trust is pivotal when selecting financial institutions, especially for significant products like mortgages and savings accounts. Neobanks, despite offering innovative services, often face skepticism regarding their long-term viability, particularly among older demographics. This trust deficit poses a substantial challenge to their expansion.

Convenience vs Coverage

Neobanks win on convenience, with app-first experiences that are intuitive and fast. However, traditional banks dominate on breadth of service. A 2023 study by EY found that 72% of UK customers still rely on a combination of digital and physical banking channels, underscoring the importance of branch networks and diverse product portfolios. For many customers, access to in-person advice for mortgages or complex financial needs remains a critical factor in choosing an incumbent.

Demographic and Generational Divides

Age, location, and income level strongly influence banking preferences. Neobanks are particularly popular with younger generations, who are more open to trying new technologies and prioritise mobile-first experiences. Research by Finder UK in 2023 revealed that nearly 70% of neobank users are under the age of 40. Conversely, incumbents like Lloyds maintain dominance among older age groups, who often prefer familiar brands and value long-term relationships.

Geographic trends also play a role—while neobanks are thriving in urban centres with higher concentrations of younger, digitally-savvy populations, incumbents maintain steady engagement in rural areas and regions where internet access or tech adoption rates may lag.

Brand Recognition and Marketing

Traditional banks benefit from longstanding brand recognition and extensive marketing efforts. Neobanks, while innovative, often lack the same level of consumer awareness. Google Trends data indicates that search interest in neobanks spikes during major announcements but lacks the consistency seen with established banks, suggesting that neobanks have yet to achieve sustained brand presence.

The Competitive Landscape: What’s Next?

1. Bridging the Trust Gap

For neobanks, building trust will be critical. Offering services like FSCS protection (as Monzo and Starling do) is a start, but emphasising long-term financial stability will be essential to attract older and more conservative customers.

2. Diversifying Services

To challenge incumbents, neobanks will need to expand beyond current accounts into areas like mortgages, loans, and wealth management. Chase’s cashback features and savings accounts show promise, but scaling these offerings sustainably remains a challenge.

3. Incumbents Fighting Back

Traditional banks are not standing still. Lloyds, for instance, has heavily invested in its digital services. As their apps improve and mimic some features of neobanks, the differentiation becomes less stark.

4. The Role of Demographics

Generational shifts will play a key role in the future of banking. Younger customers are more likely to adopt neobanks, and as these generations grow older, their loyalty could shift the market dynamics.

5. Partnerships and Ecosystems

Neobanks could thrive by integrating with broader ecosystems such as partnerships with fintech apps or even incumbent banks. Lloyds’ own foray into Open Banking partnerships hints at this trend.

Final Thoughts

The battle between neobanks and traditional banks in the UK isn’t just a contest of user numbers or app features—it’s a reflection of trust, demographics, and shifting consumer expectations. While neobanks are reshaping perceptions of what banking can be, incumbents like Lloyds remain deeply entrenched in the financial lives of millions.

For fintech and financial services professionals, the key takeaway is this: innovation isn’t enough. Success lies in understanding the broader market context, bridging the trust gap, and delivering value to customers across demographics and regions.

The future of banking in the UK may not belong solely to neobanks or incumbents—it’s likely a hybrid of both, driven by collaboration, competition, and the evolving needs of consumers.

Intrigued? Let’s talk

Contact BehindLogin